SPONSORED BY

ABOUT THIS SITE CORRUPTION ANTICORRUPTION WOMEN AND CORRUPTION RESOURSES AND USEFUL LINKS THE IAPBWB SEMINAR 2002 CORRUPTION IN BULGARIA ÍÀ ÁÚËÃÀÐÑÊÈ
THE IAPBWB SEMINAR
 

IAPBWB
International Networking Seminar on
“Professional & Business Women Against Corruption – Practical Aspects”

(Sofia 4-6 December 2002)


On 4-6 December 2002 the International Association of Professional and Business Women in Bulgaria(IAPBWB) organized in close cooperation with Norwegian partners and in partnership with the American Chamber of Commerce in Bulgaria (AmCham – Bulgaria) an international networking seminar on “Professional & Business Women Against Corruption- Practical Aspects”. 

The IAPBWB applied integrated approach, bringing together Bulgarian and international partners - professional and business women’s associations, Government officials, experts and other interested international actors.

AGENDA
 
 

Wednesday 4 December 2002

14,00-18,30 Registration (RadissonSAS Grand Hotel)

19,30 - Welcome cocktail -hosted by the IAPBWB

Thursday 5 December 2002
9,00 –12,00 Plenary Session
9,00 – Opening remarks by Nina Noeva - President, IAPBWB and H.E. Rolf Baltzersen - Ambassador of the Kingdom of Norway to Bulgaria 

9,15 - Practical aspects of law enforcement measures against corruption in Bulgaria – presentation by Mr. Boiko Kotsev – Deputy Minister of the Interior of Bulgaria

9,30 – Fighting Corruption – The Norwegian Experience : Presentation by Mr. Terje Ingstad Senior adviser at the Royal Norwegian Ministry of Justice

10,00 - “Coalition 2000” and its practical experience with the implementation of anticorruption recommendations – presentation by Martin Dimov : “National research on problems of MSE’s in Bulgaria”

10,15.- Fighting corruption – Ms. Karen Kramer –US Embassy in Sofia, Resident Legal Adviser of the US Department of Justice 

10,30 - Coffee Break

10,45 - Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe its anticorruption efforts - 2 years after, results and future steps – presentation by SP National Coordinator Ambassador Vladimir Filipov

11,00 - The role of business and professional ethics (codes of ethic norms) in reducing corrupt practices - presentation by Mr. Valentin Georgiev Executive Director of the American Chamber of Commerce in Bulgaria

11,15 - Professional & business networks’ contribution – can we help to counter the negative effects of unfair practices with innovative tools–Internet presentation of IAPBWB.

11,30 - The role of media in combating corruption – presentation by a lead journalist from Bulgarian media.

12,00 Discussion moderated by IAPBWB moderator

12,30 - End of Plenary Session

12,45 – Lunch

14,00 – 16,00 Workshop session

14,00 – Workshop: Anticorruption contribution of professional and business women:

Brainstorming discussion

  • Topics: Business vs. corruption etc.

  • 15,30 – Summarising the results from the session

    15,45- Coffee break
    16,00- Presentation by Irene Erhardt-Waestberg -TIAW European co-ordinator - “The Power of Networking” and World caf?

    18,00 – End of working part of the day

    19,30 – International Executive & Business Women Networking Dinner (withshort notes from representatives of the international networks presented)

    Friday 6 December 2002 
    8,30 - Networking breakfast

    9,30 – Closing Plenary session

  • Summarising the results from the Seminar 

  • 11,00 -Adjourn

    PLENARY SESSION

  • Presentation of Deputy Minister of the Interior Mr. Boiko Kotsev (in Bulgarian)
  • Presentation of Mr. Terje Ingstad – Senior Adviser, Royal Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Police 
  • Presentation of Ms Karen Kramer – US Department of Justice resident legal adviser, US Embassy in Sofia

  • Photos from the Plenary Session


     
     
  • Play video from Plenary Session
  • FIRST WORKSHOP 

    Moderated by Christa Pleasants Hunter

  • What is your definition of corruption? Do they cover all practical forms of corrupt practices you have faced in business?

  • The Council of Europe defines corruption as:

    Corruption means requesting, offering, giving or accepting, directly or indirectly, a bribe or any other undue advantage or prospect thereof, which distorts the proper performance of any duty or behavior required of the recipient of the bribe, the undue advantage or the prospect thereof. 

    The World Bank defines corruption as:

    The offering, giving, receiving, or soliciting of any thing of value to influence the action of a public official in the procurement process or in contract execution. 

    Group clarification:

  • Corruption is in all layers of life.
  • Corruption is the misuse of power for personal profit and benefit. 
  • The bribe can be not only a material benefit, but also a favor, which is not so visible. 
  • Passive observation of an act of corruption is also corruption. 
  • The lack of transparency in tender procedures provokes corruption. 
  • It is important to identify which state authorities are involved in fighting corruption.
  • Corruption is at all levels, but we have to start with topmost public officials. 
  • People who give and take bribes are corrupt. Receiving a bribe should be penalized harder than giving, so that people who are offered a bribe would not be afraid to report it. 
  • Given your professional experience …Do codes of conduct and professional ethics limit corrupt practices?
  • Codes of conducts are very helpful for limiting corruption. However, not all companies have them and even if they have them, they do not always comply with them. 
  • There should be an independent agency, to which people who are subjected to corruption can complain. 
  • The court should follow a code of ethics as well.
  • There is not enough education about courts and business ethics in Eastern Europe.
  • The existing attitude towards codes of ethics is deeply rooted in the historical heritage of the region. A mental change is necessary in the attitude towards corruption. Though international companies have codes of ethics, local companies do not. 
  • People are not corrupt in nature. But, if you are doing business fairly and you see that people who accept bribes have a higher standard of living and greater advantages, you might be tempted. 
  • You need effective legislation and you need the laws to be implemented in order to combat corruption. 
  • Is there any link between corruption and the “glass ceiling” – hidden vertical gender segregation?
  • The “glass ceiling” has two sides. The “glass ceiling” can incite corruption on the side of the woman. She might be provoked to offer services or favors to the manager in order to break through the glass ceiling. 
  • Women should participate in the decision making process. If women took a stronger role in the decision making process, they will help combat corruption, as women are less corrupt. 
  • When women enter the decision making process, the whole process is changed. That is difficult, because it is tough to change traditions.
  • Men are judged by their material gains. Women are more interested in the social care-taking role. 
  • Both men and women need to lobby for the solution of these problems. 

  • 4) Can new technology reduce corruption and how?
  • Technology is not a solution by itself, but it is a tool to reduce corruption. Procedures can be made more transparent by technology. You can reduce corruption by reducing or eliminating the human factor. Transparency, publicity and accessibility are key. 
  • New technology is good for women, because it is objective and promotes equality. 
  • Technology saves time and women can manage taking care of the family and advancing in her job. 
  • There will be less corruption with the automation of procedures. 
  • Trade over the Internet will reduce corruption. To buy and sell online is a good possibility to reduce corruption by eliminating the middleman. 
  • Links between the customs, police and the authorities will reduce crime and corruption. 
  • If technology can provide an opportunity for people to remain anonymous, they can report cases of corruption. You have access to information over the Internet, and information is power. 
  •  

    SECOND WORKSHOP – “The Power of Networking”

    POINTS OF ACTION

    Presentation by Irene Erhardt-Waestberg

    -- Why are we here if we do not believe we can make a difference?

    -- Because, we do believe we can achieve changes. 

    -- We have no time to lose. 

    Change involves two things – awareness and action.

    The participants in the IAPBWB Seminar came up with the following action points for combating corruption:

  • Stop being passive: organize a group, there is strength in numbers.
  • “Tell”– do not accept wrong doing; talk about it, ask questions.
  • Educate your families and your colleagues that corruption is wrong.
  • Be a good example – do not engage in corrupt practices.
  • Do not work with corrupt organizations/companies.
  • Do business and network with ethical people – make unethical people feel isolated.
  • Ask for paper work – put everything in writing, it is a good tool against corruption.
  • Identify the right people in the state authorities to talk to. Ensure access to the decision-makers.
  • Write a letter to the Prime Minister, the President, the Minister of Justice, the Minister of State Administration, and the Minister of Interior. Inform them about the results of the conference and ask them what they intend to do to combat corruption. Invite them to participate in the next conference “The Power of Networking” 2003.
  • Find a journalist willing to take up the cause against corruption and ensure publicity.
  • Invest ourselves – gather information, network. 
  • Find useful partners – international and local organizations and networks
  • Get qualified training. 
  • Develop a website: www.anticorruption-online.org and promote it as an independent source of information and develop a chat room for exchange of information. 

  • Encourage people to share experiences – organize e-mail campaigns. 


    Photos from Workshops and Closing Session

  • Play video from Workshops and Closing Session 

  •  

    The IAPBWB Seminar reached its goals - it increased awareness in Bulgaria and wider internationally to the negative effects of corrupt practices and made the voice of professional and business women on this issue heard by the authorities. It helped identify possible practical answers on how executive women networks can help reduce detrimental corrupt behaviours using their unique networking know-how and capacity. 

    Its follow-up activities in 2003 will include an Assessment of Responsiveness Evaluation (ARE) and other measurable anticorruption efforts.